The Auditor General has unveiled significant corruption, mismanagement, and procurement fraud at ST. JOSEPH'S NYABIGENA BOYS HIGH SCHOOL, led by Principal Dismas Omoke
The latest
report from the Auditor General for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, concerning Joseph's Nyabigena Boys High School under Principal Dismas Omoke, has disclosed extensive corruption, financial mismanagement, and a tender fraud scheme, where a considerable sum of money is believed to have been misappropriated for personal gain.
Stakeholders
and parents appear to concur with the findings of the report and are now urging
the EACC and DCI to conduct further investigations to ensure that those found
responsible are held accountable.
There
have been numerous complaints from parents and stakeholders regarding Omoke’s
management and leadership style, with many accusing him of authoritarianism,
coercion, intimidation, and threats against those who express differing
opinions.
Parents
are now appealing to the education CS, in conjunction with the TSC, to expedite
his transfer when schools reopen for the first term of 2026. The report
indicates that there have been instances of public funds being misappropriated
through irregular procurement practices for goods and services.
Direct
Procurement of Teaching and Learning Materials
The
receipts and payments statement indicated tuition payments totaling Kshs.
1,010,139, as detailed in Note 6 of the financial statements. However, an
examination of the payment vouchers related to tuition expenses uncovered that
direct procurement of teaching and learning materials was conducted, amounting
to Kshs. 900,000 from various suppliers.
Moreover,
no justification was presented for employing the direct procurement method, as
mandated by Regulation 90 (lxa) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal
Regulations, 2020, and Section 103 of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal
Act, 2015.
This
raises concerns that the method may have been utilized to circumvent
competition. Additionally, the inspection and acceptance certificates were not
made available for audit review. Consequently, the value for money achieved
from the expenditure of Kshs. 900,000 could not be verified. Furthermore,
Management was found to be in violation of the law.
Long
Outstanding Accounts Payable
The
statement of assets and liabilities, as disclosed in Note 14 of the financial
statements, indicates an accounts payable balance of Kshs.19,612,541, which
encompasses trade creditors amounting to Kshs.17,890,682, for which supporting
payment vouchers were not made available for audit.
Additionally,
within the trade creditor balance, there exists an amount of Kshs.9,926,680
that has remained outstanding for over one (1) year, in violation of Regulation
42 (1 Xb) of the Public Finance Management (National Government) Regulations,
2015, which stipulates that debt service payments should take precedence.
Given
these circumstances, the existence, accuracy, and authenticity of the
Kshs.17,890,682 trade creditor balances could not be verified. Furthermore, it
appears that Management may have contravened the law.
The
statement of receipts and payments, as outlined in Note 2 of the financial
statements, reported Kshs.9,468,399 as capitation grants for operational
purposes.
However,
an examination of the School's NEMIS portal and the operational account bank
statement disclosed that the School actually received capitation grants for
operations totaling Kshs.10,868,399.84 during the review period, of which
Kshs.3,512,000 was intended for transfer to the infrastructure account.
Nevertheless, only Kshs.1,400,000 was transferred, leading to an unreconciled
variance of Kshs.2,112,000.
Moreover,
it was observed that the funds designated for transfer to the infrastructure
bank accounts had been improperly redirected to the School's operations,
contrary to the Ministry of Education Circular Ref. No: MOE.HQS/3/13/3 dated 16
June 2021, which mandated that infrastructure grants and maintenance and
improvement funds be transferred to the school infrastructure account within
fifteen days of receipt in the operations account. In light of these
circumstances, the management was found to be in violation of the law.
Comments
Post a Comment